Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Storytelling. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων
Εμφάνιση αναρτήσεων με ετικέτα Storytelling. Εμφάνιση όλων των αναρτήσεων

Κυριακή 23 Ιουλίου 2017

Welcome Harry To Diagon Alley!

A cobblestoned shopping area for the wizarding world, where Hogwarts students can purchase necessary supplies."
—Description of Diagon Alley 

Diagon Alley is a cobblestoned wizarding alley and shopping area located in London, England behind a pub called the Leaky Cauldron. Inside the alley is an assortment of restaurants, shops, and other sights. All items on the Hogwarts supply list can be bought at Diagon Alley. The alley is completely hidden from the Muggle world which is right outside of its boundaries. It is very large in area and essentially the centre of wizarding London

History

Early history

The Leaky Cauldron was present long before Charing Cross Road was even planned in the nineteenth centery; its true address is number one, Diagon Alley, and it is believed to have been built some time in the early 1500s, along with the rest of the wizarding street. It is a popular historical theory that the second oldest building in Diagon Alley is Gringotts Wizarding Bank and that the other shops grew up around it. However, there is a possibility that Ollivanders is the oldest building, records dating back to the early fourth century B.C.
When the Statute of Secrecy was imposed Diagon Alley was hidden by the use of many powerful spells of concealment. The then Minister for Magic, Ulick Gamp agreed to give the landlord of the day present at the Leaky Caluldron responsibility for letting people into Diagon Alley from his back yard.
In 1926, one of the shops in Diagon Alley was burgled with the help of a Four-Headed Bird.

Harry Potter's first visit

"There were shops selling robes, shops selling telescopes and strange silver instruments Harry had never seen before, windows stacked with barrels of bat spleens and eels' eyes, tottering piles of spell books, quills, and rolls of parchment, potion bottles, globes of the moon..."
—Harry Potter visits Diagon Alley for the first time

Diagon-film
Diagon Alley in the films
Harry Potter's first visit to Diagon Alley with Rubeus Hagrid marked his re-introduction to the wizarding world. Harry's first stop was Gringotts Wizarding Bank, where he encountered Goblins for the first time. After obtaining money from the bank Hagrid helped Harry shop for his school supplies and purchased Harry's eleventh birthday present, the snowy owl Hedwig, from Eeylops Owl Emporium. Harry also purchased his wand from Ollivanders. When visiting Diagon Alley Harry remarked that he wished he had more than one set of eyes to be able to take in all the sights the alley has to offer.

Return of the Dark Lord

"The colourful, glittering window displays of spellbooks, potion ingredients, and cauldrons were lost to view, hidden behind the large Ministry of Magic posters that had been pasted over them... A few windows were boarded up, including those of Florean Fortescue's Ice Cream Parlour. On the other hand, a number of shabby-looking stalls had sprung up along the street."
—Description of Diagon Alley's gloominess

Death eaters1
Death Eaters maniacally attack shops and kidnapping Ollivander along Diagon Alley in 1996
In 1996, the return of Voldemort affected the appearance of Diagon Alley dramatically. Wizards and witches no longer felt safe wandering out in public. The once-crowded streets stood virtually empty, the few shoppers staying together in groups; "Wanted" posters with the faces of Death Eaters plastered the fronts of once-bright shops and street stalls popped up, hawking "protective" amulets and charms.
Ollivanders and Florean Fortescue's Ice Cream Parlour were closed.

Source: http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Diagon_Alley

Κυριακή 20 Νοεμβρίου 2016

Διήγημα Fractal: "Βιβλίο χωρίς συγγραφέα"

Του Θανάση Πάνου στο Fractal, Η γεωμετρία των ιδεών



Αυτό το βιβλίο το μίσησα. Ήθελα να το ρίξω στη φωτιά.
Ναι παραδέχομαι ότι αυτό το βιβλίο με έκανε να νοιώσω ανόητος. Δεν με χάιδεψε, δεν με ντάντεψε, δεν ερχόταν σε καμία σελίδα του να με συναντήσει ευπρόσδεκτα ή να προσφέρει παρηγοριά. Τίποτα μέσα του δεν έκανε την πραγματική προσπάθεια να μου γελάσει να γίνει ευχάριστο κι αυτό με μαστίγωνε συνέχεια προσφέροντας μου μια εκνευριστική αίσθηση κατωτερότητας. Έκανε υποτονικά μια επιτομή της ευφυΐας μου και με περιφρόνηση συνέχιζε σελίδα-σελίδα να μου υπενθυμίζει την άγνοιά μου.
Το διάβαζα εξοργισμένος με την ενόχληση ότι δεν αποκάλυπτε λύσεις, δεν πρόσφερε θεραπεία στην επιμέλεια μου. Ξαφνικά όμως στη τελευταία σελίδα ένοιωσα την έλλειψη της πλήξης. Ακρωτηριάζοντας συστηματικά στην αφήγησή του αυτά που ήθελα να ακούσω για την αιώνια αγάπη, για τη νίκη του καλού, την ελπίδα και την αναμονή για ένα καλύτερο αύριο, παγώνοντας όλες τις αξίες και τα πρότυπα και κουρελιάζοντας την νίκη της ζωής απέναντι στο θάνατο με ξεγύμνωσε.
Χώθηκε σελίδα-σελίδα αθόρυβα στο μυαλό μου και το αναποδογύρισε επιδεικνύοντας την θλιβερή ματαιοδοξία μου. Τελικά κατάλαβα, ένοιωσα όλα τα μπαγιάτικα που συσσωρεύονται μέσα μου με την υπόσχεση της βοήθειας των τυποποιημένων λύσεων ή το χάιδεμα των αισθήσεων. Αναπάντεχα αυτό το βιβλίο με συνέπεια και ακρίβεια ανατόμου ανάδωσε την σχιζοφρένια του αναγνώστη να χάνεται σε μια ιστορία, να αντιμετωπίζει την πραγματικότητα σαν ξένη ή να προσπαθεί να δραπετεύσει από αυτή με την ταύτισή του με τον ήρωα του συγγραφέα.
Το βιβλίο αυτό που θέλησα στη πυρά να το ρίξω γιατί ως βιβλίο δεν θέλησε να παράγει συλλογικούς καρπούς, πανομοιότυπους, συνειδητοποίησα τελικά ότι θριάμβευσε αποσυνθέτοντας τα στερεότυπα και τις αξίες, τα κριτήρια ομορφιάς και του νοήματος, τα συμβατικά συναισθήματα και όλα αυτά χωρίς να προσηλυτίζει στη δική του θεϊκή πόλη. Απλά, σε καλούσε σε μια πόλη που γελοιοποιούσε την ψευδό-ηθική και ήταν σε θέση να αγκαλιάσει ένα μεγάλο κομμάτι της πραγματικότητας, όπως η φαντασία, η ψευδαίσθηση, η παραίσθηση, το παράλογο γιατί όλα αυτά είναι ανθρώπινα.
Η τελευταία σελίδα του, χωρίς καμία λέξη είχε μόνο το σχέδιο ενός νεκρού ζώου, ενός πεινασμένου παιδιού μέσα σε μια φύση νεκρή και πάνω σε ένα δένδρο τον Miles Davis να παίζει μοναχικά την τρομπέτα του. Ήταν ο « χώρος» που έκλεινε το βιβλίο και αποχαιρετούσε ρουφώντας τον αναγνώστη σε ένα ενιαίο αισθητικό αποτέλεσμα με αφετηρία και χωρίς τέλος.

 
ΣΥΓΓΡΑΦΕΑΣ

Ο διπλά κουτσός λαχειοπώλης
σερνόμενος με τον κορμό του
κραυγάζει την τύχη την καταραμένη:
«και ποιος έχει λεφτά για πέταμα;»
Της ίδιας γενιάς άλλος ρακένδυτος,
ρωτούσε αυστηρά:
«έχετε διαβάσει αυτό το βιβλίο;
Δεν είναι για γυναίκες και παιδιά
είναι ένα εξαιρετικά πρόστυχο βιβλίο»
Είναι το είδος του βιβλίου στα χέρια ενός
που αποκαλύπτει ότι είναι χωρίς νόημα
μα αυτό δεν είναι τίποτα…
«εδώ υπάρχει ένα αληθινό βιβλίο
είναι χονδροειδές μέχρι ακόλαστο
αν το αγοράσεις θα το διαβάσεις!»
Αν εξαιρέσεις το αισθητικό πρόβλημα του χώρου,
η καταδίκη του ακαδημαϊσμού ήταν ευχάριστη
από την περιγραφή της ρητορικής αυτής απάτης:
«έχετε διαβάσει αυτό το πολύτιμο βιβλίο;»
Η έλλειψη χώρου με έσπρωξε
πάνω στα απλωμένα χέρια του
και στη ματιά του που ανίχνευε
τις σκέψεις μέσα μου…
«ιερό! ιερό! αυτό το πολύτιμο βιβλίο»
άνοιγε τα χέρια να με αγκαλιάσει
ζητώντας την ίδια ανταπόδοση,
γνωρίζοντας ότι είμαι ο συγγραφέας.»

Πηγή: http://goo.gl/w1pwLl/

Σάββατο 31 Μαΐου 2014

Amazing 'Flatliners' Plot, Visually Mesmerizing..

An Amazing Sci-Fi Thriller Starring  Kiefer Sutherland, Julia Roberts, William Baldwin, Oliver Platt, Kevin Bacon

Nelson Wright (Kiefer Sutherland), convinces four of his medical school classmates — Joe Hurley (William Baldwin), David Labraccio (Kevin Bacon), Randall Steckle (Oliver Platt) and Rachel Manus (Julia Roberts) — to help him discover what lies beyond death. Nelson flatlines for one minute before his classmates resuscitate him. While "dead", he experiences a sort of afterlife. He sees a vision of a boy he bullied as a child, Billy Mahoney. He merely tells his friends that he can't describe what he saw, but something is there. The others decide to follow Nelson's daring feat. Joe flatlines next, and he experiences an erotic afterlife sequence. He agrees with Nelson's claim that something indeed exists. David is third to flatline, and he sees a vision of a girl, Winnie Hicks (Kimberly Scott), that he bullied in grade school. The three men start to experience vivid hallucinations that are related to their afterlife visions, but Nelson's circumstances are particularly freakish; he is repeatedly physically attacked by Billy Mahoney and each day presents with fresh cuts and wounds. Joe, engaged to be married, is haunted by home videos that he secretly filmed of his sexual trysts with other women. David is confronted by a vision of Winnie Hicks on a train, and she verbally taunts him like he did to her.

At Rachel's insistence, the group agrees to let her flatline next. David, disturbed by his hallucinations, has a change of heart and tries to stop the others from giving Rachel their same fate, but she has already flatlined by the time he arrives. They are almost unable to bring Rachel back to life after the power goes out, as the men cannot shock her with the defibrillator paddles. Luckily they manage to recusitate her, but she, too, begins experiencing haunting flashbacks: in her case, memories of her father committing suicide when she was a young girl. One by one, the other men open up about their harrowing experiences to one another, and David decides to put his visions to a stop. He tracks down Winnie Hicks, now grown up, and travels to her home to offer an apology. Winnie thanks him, and accepts his apology. David immediately feels a weight lifted off his shoulders. Nelson, who has accompanied David on the trip, remains alone in David's truck and catches a glimpse of Billy Mahoney darting past outside. Suddenly Billy appears inside the truck and attacks him with a pickaxe. Nelson struggles to fend him off and David arrives on the scene just in time to end the hallucination and prevent serious injury to Nelson, revealing that Nelson was alone in the truck and that he was attacking himself with the pickaxe. Meanwhile, Joe's fiancée, Anne (Hope Davis), unexpectedly comes to his apartment, and she breaks off their engagement after discovering his videos. Joe's visions cease after Anne leaves him. Rachel seeks comfort in the arms of David, and the two spend the night together in bed. While Rachel and David are together, Nelson brings Steckle and Joe to the gravesite of Billy Mahoney. He reveals a long-kept secret: he and his friends inadvertently killed Billy Mahoney as youngsters when they chased him up a tree and pelted him with rocks, causing him to fall to his death. Nelson mutters to himself about making amends, then suddenly storms off, leaving Joe and Steckle stranded.

David leaves Rachel alone in order to pick up Joe and Steckle from the cemetery. While alone, Rachel goes to the bathroom, and encounters her father. He apologizes to his daughter, and her guilt over his death is lifted when she discovers that he was addicted to heroin. Rachel receives a phone call from Nelson, who tells her that he needs to flatline again in order to make amends. He apologizes for involving her and their friends in his plan before hanging up. Rachel and the other three men realize what Nelson is planning and race to save him, eventually reaching him more than nine minutes after his phone call. They work feverishly to save him, but too much time has passed and they decide to give up. Meanwhile, in the afterlife a young Nelson has reversed roles with Billy Mahoney and is being pelted with rocks by him and his other friends while up in the tree. Young Nelson falls from the tree, morphing into the older Nelson just before hitting the ground. He looks up to see Billy Mahoney standing over him and smiling before slowly walking away into a bright light, having made peace. In an act of utter frustration, David gives Nelson one last shock. Miraculously, Nelson is resuscitated, and after regaining consciousness he tells them, "Today wasn't a good day to die."

(Source Wikipedia)

Δευτέρα 28 Απριλίου 2014

Romanticism, Romantic Era, Romantic Period

Romanticism (also the Romantic era or the Romantic period) was an artistic, literary, and intellectual movement that originated in Europe toward the end of the 18th century and in most areas was at its peak in the approximate period from 1800 to 1850. Partly a reaction to the Industrial Revolution, it was also a revolt against the aristocratic social and political norms of the Age of Enlightenment and a reaction against the scientific rationalization of nature. It was embodied most strongly in the visual arts, music, and literature, but had a major impact on historiography, education and the natural sciences. Its effect on politics was considerable and complex; while for much of the peak Romantic period it was associated with liberalism and radicalism, its long-term effect on the growth of nationalism was probably more significant.
The movement validated intense emotion as an authentic source of aesthetic experience, placing new emphasis on such emotions as apprehension, horror and terror, and awe—especially that which is experienced in confronting the sublimity of untamed nature and its picturesque qualities: both new aesthetic categories. It elevated folk art and ancient custom to a noble status, made spontaneity a desirable characteristic (as in the musical impromptu), and argued for a "natural" epistemology of human activities, as conditioned by nature in the form of language and customary usage. Romanticism reached beyond the rational and Classicist ideal models to raise a revived medievalism and elements of art and narrative perceived to be authentically medieval in an attempt to escape the confines of population growth, urban sprawl, and industrialism. Romanticism embraced the exotic, the unfamiliar, and the distant in modes more authentic than Rococo chinoiserie, harnessing the power of the imagination to envision and to escape.
Although the movement was rooted in the German Sturm und Drang movement, which prized intuition and emotion over the rationalism of the Enlightenment, the events of and ideologies that led to the French Revolution planted the seeds from which both Romanticism and the Counter-Enlightenment sprouted. The confines of the Industrial Revolution also had their influence on Romanticism, which was in part an escape from modern realities. Indeed, in the second half of the 19th century, "Realism" was offered as a polarized opposite to Romanticism. Romanticism assigned a high value to the achievements of 'heroic' individualists and artists, whose pioneering examples, it maintained, would raise the quality of society. It also vouched for the individual imagination as a critical authority allowed of freedom from classical notions of form in art. There was a strong recourse to historical and natural inevitability, a Zeitgeist, in the representation of its ideas.

Basic characteristics

 

Defining the nature of Romanticism may be approached from the starting point of the primary importance of the free expression of the feelings of the artist. The importance the Romantics placed on untrammelled feeling is summed up in the remark of the German painter Caspar David Friedrich that "the artist's feeling is his law". To William Wordsworth poetry should be "the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings". In order to truly express these feelings, the content of the art must come from the imagination of the artist, with as little interference as possible from "artificial" rules dictating what a work should consist of. Coleridge was not alone in believing that there were natural laws governing these matters which the imagination, at least of a good creative artist, would freely and unconsciously follow through artistic inspiration if left alone to do so. As well as rules, the influence of models from other works would impede the creator's own imagination, so originality was absolutely essential. The concept of the genius, or artist who was able to produce his own original work through this process of "creation from nothingness", is key to Romanticism, and to be derivative was the worst sin. This idea is often called "romantic originality."
Not essential to Romanticism, but so widespread as to be normative, was a strong belief and interest in the importance of nature. However this is particularly in the effect of nature upon the artist when he is surrounded by it, preferably alone. In contrast to the usually very social art of the Enlightenment, Romantics were distrustful of the human world, and tended to believe that a close connection with nature was mentally and morally healthy. Romantic art addressed its audiences directly and personally with what was intended to be felt as the personal voice of the artist. So, in literature, "much of romantic poetry invited the reader to identify the protagonists with the poets themselves". According to Isaiah Berlin, Romanticism embodied "a new and restless spirit, seeking violently to burst through old and cramping forms, a nervous preoccupation with perpetually changing inner states of consciousness, a longing for the unbounded and the indefinable, for perpetual movement and change, an effort to return to the forgotten sources of life, a passionate effort at self-assertion both individual and collective, a search after means of expressing an unappeasable yearning for unattainable goals."

(Source Wikipedia)

Παρασκευή 28 Μαρτίου 2014

Who Is Steering Your Creative Ship?

by, Jacob Krueger

 

The Captain And The Navigator


If you imagine your writing as a ship, then you can think of your subconscious, creative brain as the Captain, and the conscious editing brain as the Navigator.
Having a good Navigator is a vital part of keeping the ship afloat. After all, it’s the Navigator who reads the charts, plots the course, adjusts for winds and currents, and makes sure you arrive in the most efficient way possible. The Navigator makes the plans that make the Captain’s goals possible. Tell the Navigator where you want to go, and the Navigator will get you there.

 

The Trouble Occurs When The Navigator Starts To Think He Or She Is The Captain

 



Imagine your terrified Editing Brain Navigator, clinging desperately to the helm in the middle of the storm, seeing the rocks ahead, and not knowing what to do about them: frantically pouring through screenwriting books, planning, outlining, writing character backstories, building image systems, refining your hook, organizing around a theme, obsessing day and night…
But no matter what it does the rocks just keep getting closer. Because your editing brain doesn’t know how to steer the ship.
Unlike the Captain, the Navigator has no idea how the intricate inner workings of the ship actually function. They don’t know how to run the rigging, manage the emotions of the crew, or make the millions of instinctual decisions that make the difference between survival and destruction.
And yet, most of us continually put the Navigator in this position. Mostly because, just like the terrified Navigator, we’re unaware that the Captain even exists. Or unwilling to trust them if they do.

 

Learning To Trust Your Creative Brain


It’s only natural that we’d feel this way. Our entire education system, since we were in kindergarten, has taught us to ignore the instinctual, creative side that actually governs 90% of what we do, and to focus instead on the editing side of our brain– the part that thinks before we speak, second guesses our actions, and prepares us for a role on the Henry Ford assembly line of life.
This same mistake is repeated by almost every screenwriting book on the market and almost every screenwriting guru on circuit. More and more and more education for the editing brain, until it thinks it’s the only brain on the ship.
And the next thing you know, you’re completely blocked.

 

This Is Where Writer’s Block Comes From.


Just like in any enterprise, when you travel too long with the wrong person at the helm, there’s usually a mutiny brewing. And of course the same is true when it comes to writing.
Your writer’s block may take the form of complete paralysis. Or it may take an even more insidious form– dull, flat, boring writing– the feeling that there’s something inside you that’s dying to come out, but that it’s never making its way onto the page.

 

Put Your Creative Captain Back At The Helm


Unlike your conscious editing Navigator, your subconscious creative Captain doesn’t give a hoot about Archetypes, Structure, Format, Symbol or any of the millions of other informational ideas that gurus preach and film professors salivate over.
There will be plenty of time for that later. But first you need to learn to steer your ship.
That’s why my screenwriting workshops begin with mind opening exercises, designed to help your over-anxious Navigator retire to its cabin for some well-deserved rest, and put your creative Captain back in control.
Gradually, you’ll learn how to balance the two sides of your writer’s mind, so that both Captain and Navigator to work together in harmony to develop and craft your voice as a writer, discover the story within you, and translate it to the page.

Τρίτη 6 Δεκεμβρίου 2011

Moneyball!

Oakland Athletics general manager Billy Beane (Brad Pitt) is upset by his team's loss to the New York Yankees in the 2001 postseason. With the impending departure of star players Johnny Damon, Jason Giambi, and Jason Isringhausen to free agency, Beane attempts to devise a strategy for assembling a competitive team for 2002 but struggles to overcome Oakland's limited player payroll. During a visit to the Cleveland Indians, Beane meets Peter Brand (Jonah Hill), a young Yale economics graduate with radical ideas about how to assess players' value. Beane tests Brand's theory by asking whether he would have drafted him, Beane having been a Major League player before becoming general manager. Though scouts considered Beane a phenomenal player, his career in the Major Leagues was disappointing. After some prodding, Brand admits that he would not have drafted him until the ninth round and that Beane would probably have gone to college instead. Sensing opportunity, Beane hires Brand as the Athletics' assistant general manager.
The team's scouts are first dismissive of and then hostile towards Brand's non-traditional sabermetric approach to scouting players. Rather than relying on the scouts' experience and intuition, Brand selects players based almost exclusively on their on base percentage (OBP). By finding players with a high OBP but characteristics that lead scouts to dismiss them, Brand assembles a team of undervalued players with far more potential than the A's hamstrung finances would otherwise allow. Despite vehement objections from the scouts, Beane supports Brand's theory and hires the players he selected, such as unorthodox submarine pitcher Chad Bradford (Casey Bond). Following the free agent signings, Beane finds that he also faces opposition from Art Howe (Philip Seymour Hoffman), the Athletics' manager. With tensions already high between them because of a contract dispute, Howe disregards Beane and Brand's strategy and plays the team in a traditional style despite their unsuitability. Beane is eventually forced to trade away the lone traditional star player (Carlos Pena) to force Howe to use the new recruits.
Early in the season, the Athletics fare poorly, leading critics within and outside the team to dismiss the new method as a dismal failure. Beane convinces the owner to stay the course, and eventually the team's record begins to improve. Ultimately, the Athletics win an unprecedented 20 consecutive games, setting the American League record. Their streak is capped with a victory over the Kansas City Royals. Like many baseball players, Beane is superstitious and avoids attending or sometimes even following games as they are in progress. His family convinces him to go to the A's game against the Royals, as Oakland is already leading 11–0 after the third inning and appears set to continue their winning streak. Beane arrives, only to watch the team go to pieces and allow the Royals to even the score. Finally, the A's do clinch the victory with a walk-off home run by one of Brand's picks, Scott Hatteberg. Despite all their success, the A's lose in the first round of the postseason, this time to the Minnesota Twins. Beane is disappointed, but satisfied at having demonstrated the value of his and Brand's methods.
In closing, the film notes that Beane passed up the opportunity to become the general manager of the Boston Red Sox, despite an offer of $12.5 million a year salary, which would have made him the highest paid GM in baseball history. Also noted is Boston's World Series victory soon after in 2004, based on the theories that Beane pioneered.
(from Wikipedia)

Δευτέρα 12 Απριλίου 2010

Σαίξπηρ

Μωρός που είναι ο άνθρωπος! Άμα η τύχη του αρρωστήσει - απ'τις δικές του καταχρήσεις βέβαια -, κάθε ατυχία τη χρεώνει στον ήλιο, στο φεγγάρι και στ' αστέρια. Σαν να γινόμαστε κακούργοι από ανάγκη, ανόητοι από ουράνια επιταγή, απατεώνες, κλέφτες και προδότες από επίδραση δυνάμεων των άστρων, μέθυσοι, ψεύτες και μοιχοί από επιρροή των πλανητών. Σαν όλα τα ελαττώματά μας να τα επιβάλλει η Θεία Εντολή! Κάθε ακόλαστος φορτώνει τα κτηνώδη ένστικτά του στον ουρανό. Παράδειγμα: ο πατέρας μου ενώθηκε με τη μητέρα μου κάτω από τον αστερισμό του Δράκοντα και η γέννησή μου έγινε κάτω από τη Μεγάλη Άρκτο: γι' αυτό κι εγώ έγινα αγροίκος και φιλήδονος! Α, μπα! Θα ήμουνα ο ίδιος ακόμα και αν το παρθενικότερο αστέρι του στερεώματος λαμπύριζε την ώρα που γινόταν η νοθογονία μου!
Βασιλιάς Ληρ I. 2
Αναφορές στις αρετές, στα ελαττώματα